Five Insites

68% of US searches now end without a click

By Insites Marketing Team

Not one of this week's five rewards being clever, which is either liberating or mildly insulting depending on the week you're having. 68% of US searches now end without a click, and the fix that works best is opening an old post and changing something. A company switched off $113,000 a month of paid search and found 89% of it was defending ground it already held. Google is pulling Facebook posts into one in fifteen US searches and almost never naming the brand behind them. And our own 10,000-business study says AI picks the business it can corroborate rather than the better one. Here are your five.

1. 68% of US searches now end without a click, and only 20% of marketers have done anything about it

Rise at Seven have gathered the 2026 AEO numbers into one place, and it's a bracing read with a coffee. 68% of US Google searches now end without a click to any website. Ahrefs put the AI Overview penalty on position-one click-through at 58%. When an AI summary shows up, people click a result 8% of the time versus 15% when it doesn't, and Pew reckons roughly 1% ever click a source link inside the summary itself. All of this while ChatGPT sits on 900 million weekly users and Google's AI Mode has passed a billion monthly.

The stat that should actually make you sit up is the least dramatic one: 70% of marketers say AEO will reshape their strategy within three years, and 20% have started. Early movers are pulling 3.4 times the AI visibility of everyone else, and 83% of citations on commercial queries go to pages updated in the last twelve months. So the winning move here is largely "open the old post and change something". Not glamorous. Annoyingly effective. Rise at Seven

2. Somebody switched off $113,000 a month of paid search, and 89% of it was defending ground they already held

Anna Crowe wrote up a company that paused its paid search programme, roughly $113,000 a month across the US, UK, Australia and Canada, covering branded search, non-brand, Shopping and Performance Max, then watched what happened for thirteen weeks. On the branded campaign alone, $36,129 of spend split into $3,945 that was genuinely incremental and $32,184 that was brand defence. On the queries where paid and organic overlapped, organic was already taking 71% of the clicks with the ads still running.

The recapture curve is the part worth screenshotting: 30% of the paid-attributed revenue came back through organic and direct within six weeks, and 65% by week thirteen. Top line fell by $30,000 to $40,000 a month, while net P&L went up by $5,000 to $20,000. Which is to say you can lose revenue and make money at the same time, a fact that is either a lovely lesson in incrementality or a very awkward meeting, depending on who signed off the budget. Search Engine Land

3. The keyword question isn't "what gets volume", it's "would a human ever say this out loud"

Clearscope have a tidy piece on what actually makes a search query worth targeting, and they land on three qualities: clarity, so it shows exactly what the person wants; specificity, so it narrows the topic and kills the ambiguity; and natural language, so it sounds like something a person would genuinely say. Their example does most of the work. "Coffee" tells you nothing about anybody. "Best light roast coffee for cold brew under $20" tells you the intent, the budget, the method and roughly how close they are to their card.

It reads as obvious right up until you open a keyword list and count how many entries on it are just nouns. With voice and AI search nudging everyone towards whole sentences, the long, slightly awkward, weirdly specific query has stopped being the low-volume consolation prize and started being the one that gets matched to an actual answer. Going after "coffee" was always vanity. It's just vanity with worse conversion now. Clearscope

4. Google's AI pulled Facebook into 19.5 million AI Overviews, and hardly any of them named a brand

BrightEdge's Lemuel Park went through more than 300 million US monthly searches and found Facebook content cited in 19.5 million AI Overviews, Instagram in around 877,000 and TikTok in roughly 78,000. That's about one in fifteen US searches surfacing something from Facebook or Instagram. Each platform gets handed a different job, too: Facebook for local and community questions, Instagram for culture and shopping, TikTok for trends and how-tos, and Reddit for whenever something is broken.

Then comes the sting. On social-sourced purchase queries, retailers were cited around 85% of the time while actual product brands picked up 3 to 4% of brand mentions, and about 75% of the brands that did get named appeared exactly once. So the social post being lifted into the answer is very rarely the brand's own. Park's conclusion is that follower count has nothing to do with any of it, which is a relief for some people and a fairly expensive realisation for others. Search Engine Journal

5. Bigger brands are winning AI search for a very dull reason: they're easier to check

Our own Andrew Waite has written up what came out of putting 10,000 US local businesses through ChatGPT and Perplexity, and it's mildly deflating for anyone who built a career on outsmarting bigger competitors. AI isn't picking the better business, it's picking the one it can corroborate. More reviews, more mentions, more listings that agree with each other, and the model stops hedging. As Andrew puts it, these systems are favouring the businesses that are easier to verify, not the ones that are actually better. Scale isn't buying quality here. It's buying certainty.

Four things moved the needle regardless of size: recency, consistency, review volume (the single strongest correlating factor in the whole dataset) and focused, local, service-specific content. Recently updated small sites beat larger neglected ones more than once, which is the closest thing to good news in the piece. So it isn't really a strategy problem. It's an admin problem, which is somehow worse. Insites

Small business shout-out

This week's shout-out goes to Olive Odyssey, a Palestinian-owned olive oil collective that works with seven farmers across six regions, bottling single-estate, cold-pressed extra virgin olive oil under the name of the village it came from: Mi'ilya Koroneiki, Nablus Nabali, Deir Abu Mash'al Rumi. Organic cultivation, traditional pressing, no artificial intervention, and a harvest that changes every year because that's what happens when nobody is smoothing out the weather.

They source directly, pay above industry prices and commit to long-term relationships with the growers, which in a category built almost entirely on vague words like "artisan" is refreshingly specific. There's zaatar and sumac too, plus recipes if you'd rather be told what to do with it all. Worth a look if you want your olive oil to come with an actual address. Know a small business we should feature? Reply and let us know.